Technically, this short list doesn't seem like a short list to me. How come they came up with 8 candidates when in fact they promised to deliver maximum of 5 nominees. Does the JBC played safe in this choice? My god, they deliberated for almost a month and then came up with this crap. I don't know, but I feel they should have at least trimmed down their supposed to be "short list" to at least two or three nominees for the president to choose from. Where is our taxes going? You guys are paid to do your job, well as a taxpayer, may I ask, did you deliver???
I have the impression that you just came up with a list that would say "Oh, at least you were in for the short-list". I mean, does that short list serves as a consolation prize for the nominees.
Nominees, when you accepted the nomination for the Chief Justice post, you should know the rule, that only one of you will be appointed by the President! This is not a politicking supposedly.
And then there's the other one, sour graping around the corner. Getting interviews of some sort and saying that she was singled out. Well, I think you deserve to be singled out. In the first place, you should not have been nominated, the heck happening to this country. Don't you have at least the delicadeza to not accept the nomination? And for accepting the ominous nomination, that should be your trophy.
![]() |
Peace Be With Us |
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento